Fans Think Lindsie Chrisley Lied To Dr. Phil, Why?
Chrisley Knows Best alum Lindsie Chrisley and her sister Savannah Chrisley clashed over her non-attendance at Julie and Todd Chrisley’s appeal, and now, fans think that perhaps she lied to Dr. Phil because she was jealous of her siblings.
Lindsie Chrisley Accused Of Snitching To The FBI
The fallout when Savannah asked her half-sister to stay away from the appeal came when Lindsie mentioned the private affair on social media. Furious, Savannah also took to social media and alleged that a letter from Lindsie to the FBI was read out in court. As their fight over it continued, more news came that the letter formed part of the evidence against Todd Chrisley.
Chrisley Knows Best fans were shocked because it certainly seemed to them that Lindsie Chrisley had allegedly snitched on Julie and Todd Chrisley to the FBI. But, they can also recall that four years ago on Dr. Phil, she completely denied any involvement with the agency. Reality Tid Bit reminded fans that he asked specifically about the FBI.
Chrisley Knows Best Alum Lied, Was jealous?
During the Dr. Phil interview, several people commented that they didn’t believe Todd’s daughter at all, and several of them used the word, “jealousy.”
- She admits to bringing in the government but does not admit to being a source. Girl bye!
- I’m sorry it’s something about her I can’t get with. She’s lying. You know what you were doing when you called the feds. Girl!
- This woman is filled with jealousy. I don’t believe her.
Now that Reality Tid Bit resurrected the interviews, the outlet reminded readers that Lindsie Chrisley said “no” to the following questions by Dr, Phil:
Did you backdoor, secret source the federal government against your family?” You were not a whistleblower that turned the federal government onto your family’s wrongdoing?
Direct Contradiction On Testifying In Court
Chrisley Know’s Best fans might find it interesting to revisit the interview. Dr. Phil asked Todd Chrisley’s oldest daughter whether she would testify about the alleged sex tapes and all her other allegations when she testified in court. At the time, she said that she would. However, the jury seemed stunned because she reportedly failed to talk about that.
According to Business Insider, Lindsie Chrisley became snarky with the prosecutor. The outlet noted:
During her testimony…she was combative with the prosecutor, who asked her during cross-examination about reaching out to law enforcement about her dad, prompting the judge to intervene and tell her to stop answering questions in that tone.
She had claimed that in fact, there was “no sex tape,” and rescinded her claim that her father tried to extort her.
What are your thoughts about the Dr. Phil interview four years ago? Do you think that she did snitch on her dad, Todd Chrisley to the FBI? If she did, was she motivated by jealousy because she felt that she didn’t get the same level of attention as her half-siblings, Savannah Chrisley and Chase? Sound off in the comments below, and come back here for all your Chrisley Knows Best family news.
- ‘Live’ Kelly Ripa Responds To Son’s ‘Lord Of The Rings’ Epic Vacay Pic - August 8, 2024
- ‘Golden Bachelorette’ Fans Slam Joan Vassos’ Promo Pic - August 8, 2024
- Mark Consuelos Hosts ‘Live’ Without Kelly Ripa, Where Is She? - August 8, 2024
It was definitely sad to hear all this. as far as the two sisters fighting, I think it’s sad that one of the sisters didn’t want to be a part of the family or didn’t want to be a ride or die. and I think Savannah has the right and the responsibility to defend her parents because she’s the one who has stepped up and taken responsibility for the children. I try to tell my daughter to ask herself…. these people giving you advice. what stake do they have in it? I had learned a few years back that we all have a right to be wrong. and all we can do is give it our best guess. My best guess is Savannah is in the right. and what stake does the other one have in it. linsie looks like a bystander from where I sit. ask for Savannah’s parents. it seems to me that the sentencing was way off. I mean Todd sentence was so much more extreme than Julie’s and the other party involved the accountant. I don’t understand why all of the sentences weren’t about the same because they were all the same happening. it seems to me the accountant would have had more to do with it than Todd, but either way I think that Todd was sentenced because of his famousness and not because of his crime. I think it should be reconsidered and that’s just from where I stand and we all can be wrong. we all have a right to be wrong and that’s my best guess.